Saturday, April 27, 2019
Landmark Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words
Landmark - Case Study ExampleThe difficulty of this issue is illustrated in the aforementi oned(prenominal) case where Article 3 of the HRA was invoked.According to Article 3 of the HRA, so far as possible to do so, primary legislations and secondary legislation should be read and given belief in a substance which is compatible with Convention rights (HRA 1998, Art 3), referring to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. By merit of this provision, the conventional bearing that statutory interpretation under the act, is therefore challenged, such that instead of giving effect to the intention of the legislators, which enacted particular statutes statutory interpretation must now proceed in a manner that gives effect to the original intent of those who crafted the HRA provision. This shift away from the conventional procedure, therefore leads judges to stray in the grey area between judicial interpretation and law making, which endangers them of judicial vandalism and usurpation Parliaments will. ... In Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza 2004, the House of Lords dismissed an appeal by Ahmad Ghaidan to overturn a previous decision of the approach of Appeal which named Juan Godin-Mendoza as successor to the tenancy of the flat Godin-Mendoza lived in until the finish of his partner of the same energise by interpreting the words as his or her wife or conserve under the pack subprogram 1977 to mean as if they were his wife or husband by virtue of Art 3 of the HRA (Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza 2004, para. 51). The decision to dismiss the appeal was arrived at, by virtue of the judges interpretation of Article 3 of the HRA, which was deemed stamp down in this case, with one dissenting opinion from Lord Millet (para. 102). Based on the given case, Lord Nicholls (para. 4) determine the relevant statutory provisions as paragraphs 2 and 3 of schedule 1 to the Rent Act 197721. The surviving spouse (if any) of the original tenant, if residing in the dw elling-house immediately before the death of the original tenant, shall after the death be the statutory tenant if and so long as he or she occupies the dwelling-house as his or her residence.22. For the purposes of this paragraph, a person who was living with the original tenant as his or her wife or husband shall be treated as the spouse of the original tenant.31. Where paragraph 2 above does not apply, still a person who was a member of the original tenants family was residing with him in the dwelling-house at the time of and for the period of 2 years immediately before his death then, after his death, that person or if there is more than one such person such one of them as may be decided by agreement, or in default of agreement by
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.